basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Actors / Threat Group-3390
G0027 Unknownour call,
not MITRE’s
ATT&CK Group

Threat Group-3390

How MITRE ATT&CK characterizes this group1: Threat Group-3390 is a Chinese threat group that has extensively used strategic Web compromises to target victims. The group has been active since at least 2010 and has targeted organizations in the aerospace, government, defense, technology, energy, manufacturing and gambling/betting sectors.

Origin / sponsor: not established from a curated public advisory — see Coverage & confidence. Not asserted here.

Also tracked as: Earth Smilodon TG-3390 Emissary Panda BRONZE UNION APT27 Iron Tiger LuckyMouse Linen Typhoon — ATT&CK group page1
Read this as · tier is our editorial call, not MITRE’s

Motivation not classified from the public record.

We could not place this actor into a coarse motivation tier from ATT&CK’s intrusion-set type and description prose. That uncertainty is itself a finding — the tradecraft below is still cited; the “why” is a coverage gap. All tradecraft below is sourced to MITRE ATT&CK.

57
Techniques
ATT&CK count1
24
Named tools / malware
ATT&CK count2
0
Attributed campaigns
ATT&CK count1
12
Tactics spanned
ATT&CK count1
coverage gap
Activity bounds
no attributed campaign
01

Known for

— signature moves, each sourced to ATT&CK
ArsenalNamed tooling. ATT&CK attributes 24 tools/malware to this group, including Mimikatz, Windows Credential Editor, pwdump, gsecdump.60
ReachFurthest outcome. This actor's cited tradecraft reaches as far as outcome 4 — Data at risk — exfiltration. (editorial mapping over ATT&CK tactics).
02

Tradecraft heatmap

— ATT&CK techniques mapped onto the five attacker-outcome narratives

Each row is a documented technique (MITRE ATT&CK). Each column is one of the five attacker-outcome narratives a defender funds against. A filled cell means this technique’s own ATT&CK tactic defensibly advances that outcome. The mapping of technique→outcome is our editorial alignment over ATT&CK's tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge. A filled cell means one of the technique's own ATT&CK tactics defensibly advances that outcome; enabler tactics (C2, Defense Evasion, Discovery) heat no column.

1Front door
2Keys to the kingdom
3Lateral reach
4Data at risk
5Lights out

Reach: this actor’s cited techniques light columns 1·2·3·4 — furthest is 4 · Data at risk. (furthest-position idiom, reused from the landing map).

A dot = this technique advances that outcomeColumn 5 (Lights out) is empty — Compare: a ransomware or wiper actor lights column 5.
Editorial: the technique→outcome alignment is our call over ATT&CK’s tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge — same basis the landing page declares. Enabler tactics (C2, defense evasion, discovery) heat no column.1
03

Arsenal

— named tools & malware ATT&CK attributes to this group
MimikatzS0002 · Tool
Windows Credential EditorS0005 · Tool
pwdumpS0006 · Tool
gsecdumpS0008 · Tool
PlugXS0013 · Malware
China ChopperS0020 · Malware
gh0st RATS0032 · Malware
NetS0039 · Tool
+16 moreCoverage

ATT&CK attributes 24 tools/malware to G0027 in total; the full list is on the group page.

04

Campaign highlights

— attributed operations in the ATT&CK record
?

No attributed campaigns — coverage gap

Stated, not hidden
ATT&CK lists no first-class campaign object for G0027 at this snapshot. Public reporting may tie this actor to operations; those enter only with a named advisory under the same cite-or-die rule.
05

Latest activity

— with explicit confidence, and what we cannot yet claim
ATT&CK
snapshot

The most recent cited activity in this card is the ATT&CK record itself. We do not paste a “last seen this week” line we cannot source. Recency from secondary reporting appears here only when attached to a named advisory.

ATT&CK snapshot, compiled 2026-06-22Coverage gap — live “currently active” status not asserted
CVE ↔ actor bridge — Known exploits / Linked CVEs every link below traces to a named source; tier is explicit
Inferred / reported — lower confidence, never headline attribution 1 link(s)

These are not confirmed attribution. An inferred link is a structural ATT&CK chain (this group uses a tool whose reference cites the CVE); it is back-cited to the original report and never claims the source names the group.

CVE-2015-5119 →

ATT&CK attributes gh0st RAT (S0032) to this group, and that software’s ATT&CK reference cites CVE-2015-5119. Structural chain — not a statement that the report names the group.

original report (cited on the ATT&CK software page) ↗
06

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • Group identity, aliases, description — MITRE ATT&CK group page
  • 57 techniques — ATT&CK technique pages (linked per row)
  • 24 software (arsenal) — ATT&CK software pages
  • 10 third-party research citations — ATT&CK external references
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • Origin/sponsor not established from a curated public advisory. ATT&CK prose may imply attribution but is not asserted here — absence of a curated source is a coverage finding, not a clean bill of attribution.
  • Threat tier is OUR editorial classification (rule-based), not a MITRE field — labeled as such.
  • Technique → outcome heatmap is editorial alignment over ATT&CK tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge.
  • Activity bounds are a floor from attributed-campaign dates only — flagged approx., not a true active-since range.
  • ATT&CK has no first-class group→CVE relationship; this card asserts no specific CVE without a named advisory.
  • No attributed ATT&CK campaign object — activity bounds cannot be established.
  • Empty heatmap column(s): Lights out — consistent with this actor's nature, stated as a finding.