basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Actors / Kimsuky
G0094 Nation-stateour call,
not MITRE’s
ATT&CK Group

Kimsuky

How MITRE ATT&CK characterizes this group1: Kimsuky is a North Korea-based cyber espionage group that has been active since at least 2012. The group initially targeted South Korean government agencies, think tanks, and subject-matter experts in various fields. Its operations expanded to include the United Nations and organizations in the government, education, business services, and manufacturing sectors across the United States, Japan, Russia, and Europe. Kimsuky has focused collection on foreign…

Origin / sponsor: not established from a curated public advisory — see Coverage & confidence. Not asserted here.

Also tracked as: Black Banshee Velvet Chollima Emerald Sleet THALLIUM APT43 TA427 Springtail — ATT&CK group page1
Read this as · tier is our editorial call, not MITRE’s

Read as a state-directed operator, not a smash-and-grab.

A nation-state classification means patience, tradecraft, and an intelligence objective. When this name attaches to a vulnerability, the question shifts from “will someone exploit it” to “has a well-resourced service already built it into an operation.” All tradecraft below is sourced to MITRE ATT&CK.

109
Techniques
ATT&CK count1
17
Named tools / malware
ATT&CK count2
0
Attributed campaigns
ATT&CK count1
14
Tactics spanned
ATT&CK count1
coverage gap
Activity bounds
no attributed campaign
01

Known for

— signature moves, each sourced to ATT&CK
ArsenalNamed tooling. ATT&CK attributes 17 tools/malware to this group, including Mimikatz, PsExec, gh0st RAT, schtasks.112
ReachFurthest outcome. This actor's cited tradecraft reaches as far as outcome 5 — Lights out — disruption & extortion. (editorial mapping over ATT&CK tactics).
02

Tradecraft heatmap

— ATT&CK techniques mapped onto the five attacker-outcome narratives

Each row is a documented technique (MITRE ATT&CK). Each column is one of the five attacker-outcome narratives a defender funds against. A filled cell means this technique’s own ATT&CK tactic defensibly advances that outcome. The mapping of technique→outcome is our editorial alignment over ATT&CK's tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge. A filled cell means one of the technique's own ATT&CK tactics defensibly advances that outcome; enabler tactics (C2, Defense Evasion, Discovery) heat no column.

1Front door
2Keys to the kingdom
3Lateral reach
4Data at risk
5Lights out

Reach: this actor’s cited techniques light columns 1·2·3·4·5 — furthest is 5 · Lights out. (furthest-position idiom, reused from the landing map).

A dot = this technique advances that outcome
Editorial: the technique→outcome alignment is our call over ATT&CK’s tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge — same basis the landing page declares. Enabler tactics (C2, defense evasion, discovery) heat no column.1
03

Arsenal

— named tools & malware ATT&CK attributes to this group
MimikatzS0002 · Tool
PsExecS0029 · Tool
gh0st RATS0032 · Malware
schtasksS0111 · Tool
Gold DragonS0249 · Malware
Brave PrinceS0252 · Malware
QuasarRATS0262 · Tool
NOKKIS0353 · Malware
+9 moreCoverage

ATT&CK attributes 17 tools/malware to G0094 in total; the full list is on the group page.

04

Campaign highlights

— attributed operations in the ATT&CK record
?

No attributed campaigns — coverage gap

Stated, not hidden
ATT&CK lists no first-class campaign object for G0094 at this snapshot. Public reporting may tie this actor to operations; those enter only with a named advisory under the same cite-or-die rule.
05

Latest activity

— with explicit confidence, and what we cannot yet claim
ATT&CK
snapshot

The most recent cited activity in this card is the ATT&CK record itself. We do not paste a “last seen this week” line we cannot source. Recency from secondary reporting appears here only when attached to a named advisory.

ATT&CK snapshot, compiled 2026-06-22Coverage gap — live “currently active” status not asserted
CVE ↔ actor bridge — Known exploits / Linked CVEs every link below traces to a named source; tier is explicit
Inferred / reported — lower confidence, never headline attribution 1 link(s)

These are not confirmed attribution. An inferred link is a structural ATT&CK chain (this group uses a tool whose reference cites the CVE); it is back-cited to the original report and never claims the source names the group.

CVE-2015-5119 →

ATT&CK attributes gh0st RAT (S0032) to this group, and that software’s ATT&CK reference cites CVE-2015-5119. Structural chain — not a statement that the report names the group.

original report (cited on the ATT&CK software page) ↗
06

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • Group identity, aliases, description — MITRE ATT&CK group page
  • 109 techniques — ATT&CK technique pages (linked per row)
  • 17 software (arsenal) — ATT&CK software pages
  • 15 third-party research citations — ATT&CK external references
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • Origin/sponsor not established from a curated public advisory. ATT&CK prose may imply attribution but is not asserted here — absence of a curated source is a coverage finding, not a clean bill of attribution.
  • Threat tier is OUR editorial classification (rule-based), not a MITRE field — labeled as such.
  • Technique → outcome heatmap is editorial alignment over ATT&CK tactic data, not a separately-sourced MITRE edge.
  • Activity bounds are a floor from attributed-campaign dates only — flagged approx., not a true active-since range.
  • ATT&CK has no first-class group→CVE relationship; this card asserts no specific CVE without a named advisory.
  • No attributed ATT&CK campaign object — activity bounds cannot be established.