basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Alcatel / CVE-2007-3010
CVE-2007-3010 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Alcatel OmniPCX Enterprise vulnerability

A command execution vulnerability in Alcatel OmniPCX Enterprise's Unified Maintenance Tool allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands through the masterCGI interface.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Remote attackers can achieve unauthenticated command execution on affected Alcatel OmniPCX Enterprise systems via the Unified Maintenance Tool, enabling full system compromise. The vulnerability has been actively exploited in the wild.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-04-153EPSS 0.97407 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
10 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-04-15).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.97407 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Alcatel, OmniPCX Enterprise. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I identify the Unified Maintenance Tool's masterCGI endpoint as accessible without authentication.
Business
Enterprise communications infrastructure becomes exposed to direct remote access without credential barriers.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a request to masterCGI that injects arbitrary system commands through improper input validation.
Business
Attackers gain the ability to execute code with the privileges of the communications server process.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute commands to establish persistence, exfiltrate data, or pivot to connected systems.
Business
Critical telecommunications infrastructure is compromised, potentially disrupting voice and data communications for enterprise customers.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 10 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.