basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2009-0557
CVE-2009-0557 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Microsoft Office vulnerability

Microsoft Office contains an object record corruption vulnerability in Excel that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through crafted files.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Office Excel triggered by malformed record objects in specially crafted spreadsheets. The vulnerability has been exploited in the wild and carries a high EPSS score of 0.86365, indicating significant practical exploitation risk.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-06-083EPSS 0.58551 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
1 independent public report of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
cisa.gov ↗Confirmed
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-06-08).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.58551 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Microsoft, Office. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-94 Code Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-94 · Code InjectionInjection
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious Excel file with a corrupted object record and send it to a target user.
Business
An employee receives and opens the file, triggering remote code execution on corporate systems.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the code execution to establish persistence and move laterally within the network.
Business
Attackers gain unauthorized access to sensitive data, intellectual property, and critical business systems.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I exfiltrate confidential information or deploy additional malware across the compromised infrastructure.
Business
The organization faces data breaches, operational disruption, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 1 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by microsoft (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microsoftCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.