basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Mozilla / CVE-2010-3765
CVE-2010-3765 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Mozilla Multiple Products vulnerability

Mozilla Firefox, SeaMonkey, and Thunderbird contain a memory corruption vulnerability in JavaScript frame construction that allows remote code execution when JavaScript is enabled.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Remote attackers can execute arbitrary code by exploiting incorrect index tracking in nsCSSFrameConstructor::ContentAppended during DOM manipulation, triggering memory corruption through multiple frame creation.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-10-063EPSS 0.83279 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
5 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-06).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.83279 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Mozilla, Multiple Products. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious webpage containing JavaScript that manipulates the DOM via appendChild to trigger incorrect frame indexing.
Business
Users visiting the attacker's site with JavaScript enabled face arbitrary code execution on their systems.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the memory corruption to gain code execution within the browser process with user privileges.
Business
Attackers gain ability to steal credentials, install malware, or pivot to other systems on the user's network.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 5 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.