basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Apache / CVE-2012-0391
CVE-2012-0391 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Apache Struts 2 vulnerability

Apache Struts 2 before 2.2.3.1 contains an improper input validation flaw in the ExceptionDelegator component that enables remote code execution.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

The vulnerability allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems through crafted input. With an EPSS score of 0.875 and confirmed exploitation in the wild, this represents a critical risk requiring immediate patching.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-01-213EPSS 0.75071 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
2 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-21).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.75071 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Apache, Struts 2. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft malicious input that bypasses validation in the ExceptionDelegator component.
Business
Attackers gain the ability to execute arbitrary code with application privileges on internet-facing web servers.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I deliver the payload through standard HTTP requests to vulnerable Struts 2 applications.
Business
No authentication or special access is required, making the attack surface extremely broad across all exposed instances.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I establish command execution and pivot to internal systems or exfiltrate sensitive data.
Business
Complete compromise of web application infrastructure, potential lateral movement, and data breach impact across dependent systems.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 2 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.