basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Linux / CVE-2014-3153
CVE-2014-3153 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Linux Kernel vulnerability

The futex_requeue function in the Linux kernel fails to validate that requeue operations target distinct futex addresses, allowing local attackers to escalate privileges through improper state manipulation.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Linux kernel futex handling. Attackers with local system access can exploit insufficient address validation in futex_requeue to gain elevated privileges. Active exploitation in the wild confirms practical attack viability.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-05-253EPSS 0.37233 (verify live)4Exploit Weaponized · public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
5 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-25).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.37233 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Linux, Kernel. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management — weakness family: Authorization / access control.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementAuthorization / access control
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I gain local system access as an unprivileged user on a vulnerable Linux system.
Business
An attacker establishes a foothold on the system with standard user permissions.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a futex_requeue call that requeues a futex to itself by bypassing address validation checks.
Business
The vulnerability allows manipulation of kernel synchronization primitives without proper safeguards.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I trigger a race condition or state corruption in the kernel's futex handling logic through the invalid requeue operation.
Business
Kernel memory integrity is compromised, creating conditions for privilege escalation.
4

Data at risk — exfiltration narrative 4

Attacker
I execute code with root or kernel-level privileges by exploiting the corrupted kernel state.
Business
The attacker gains complete system control, enabling data theft, malware installation, or lateral movement.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Weaponized exploit available (VulnCheck)
  • 5 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by Chrome (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ChromeCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.