basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2015-1641
CVE-2015-1641 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Microsoft Office vulnerability

Microsoft Office memory corruption vulnerability in rich text format handling enables remote code execution with user privileges. High exploitation activity observed in the wild.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A memory corruption flaw in Office's RTF processing allows attackers to achieve code execution by crafting malicious documents. The high EPSS score and active exploitation indicate significant real-world risk despite no CVSS assignment.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.97327 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
25 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.97327 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Microsoft, Office. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-399 Resource Management Errors — weakness family: Resource / availability.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-399 · Resource Management ErrorsResource / availability
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious rich text format file that triggers memory corruption when opened in Microsoft Office.
Business
Users receive weaponized documents via email or file sharing, creating widespread infection vectors across the organization.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I deliver the malicious RTF file to target users through social engineering or watering hole tactics.
Business
Attackers gain execution context matching the compromised user's privileges, enabling lateral movement and data exfiltration.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute arbitrary code within the Office process to establish persistence or deploy secondary payloads.
Business
Incident response costs, system remediation, and potential regulatory notification obligations materialize from confirmed compromise.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 25 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by microsoft (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microsoftCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.