basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / IBM / CVE-2015-7450
CVE-2015-7450 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

IBM WebSphere Application Server and Hypervisor Edition vulnerability

Serialized-object deserialization vulnerability in IBM WebSphere Application Server allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands without authentication.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

CWE-94 unsafe deserialization flaw enables unauthenticated remote code execution. Active exploitation in the wild with high EPSS score indicates immediate threat to exposed instances.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-01-103EPSS 0.97655 (verify live)4Exploit Weaponized · public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
3 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-10).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.97655 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: IBM, WebSphere Application Server and Server Hypervisor Edition. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-94 Code Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-94 · Code InjectionInjection
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious serialized Java object and send it to the vulnerable WebSphere endpoint.
Business
Attacker gains code execution within the application server process, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability of hosted applications and data.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I escalate from application context to system-level access by leveraging server privileges.
Business
Full infrastructure compromise becomes possible, including lateral movement to other systems and persistent backdoor installation.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Weaponized exploit available (VulnCheck)
  • 3 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by ibm (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ibmCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.