basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2019-0676
CVE-2019-0676 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerability

Internet Explorer information disclosure vulnerability allowing attackers to test for file presence on disk through improper memory object handling.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An information disclosure flaw in Internet Explorer permits attackers to enumerate files on a victim's system by exploiting memory object handling. The vulnerability has been observed in active exploitation.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-05-233EPSS 0.07505 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
3 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-05-23).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.07505 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Microsoft, Internet Explorer. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious webpage that triggers improper memory object handling in Internet Explorer.
Business
User browsing habits expose system file structure to reconnaissance attacks.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I probe for the existence of specific files on the target system by observing behavioral differences in the browser's response.
Business
Attackers gain intelligence about installed software, user profiles, and system configuration without user awareness.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I use discovered file paths and system information to refine subsequent attacks or social engineering campaigns.
Business
Information disclosure becomes a stepping stone for targeted compromise, increasing breach risk and attack surface.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 3 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • Catalogued by microsoft (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microsoftCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.