basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Exim / CVE-2019-10149
CVE-2019-10149 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Exim Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) vulnerability

Improper validation of recipient addresses in Exim's deliver_message() function allows remote command execution via shell metacharacter injection.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A remote attacker can execute arbitrary commands on systems running vulnerable Exim MTA instances by crafting malicious recipient addresses that bypass validation in the delivery processing logic.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-01-103EPSS 0.99961 (verify live)4Exploit Weaponized · public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
12 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-01-10).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.99961 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Exim, Mail Transfer Agent (MTA). Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
Craft a message with a specially-formed recipient address containing shell metacharacters that evade validation checks.
Business
Attacker gains code execution with the privileges of the Exim process, typically root or a dedicated mail user.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
Inject commands through the unvalidated recipient field to execute arbitrary system operations during message delivery.
Business
Compromised mail server becomes a pivot point for lateral movement, data exfiltration, or further infrastructure compromise.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
Establish persistence or deploy malware on the affected mail transfer agent.
Business
Organization loses control of critical email infrastructure and faces potential data breach, service disruption, and regulatory exposure.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Weaponized exploit available (VulnCheck)
  • 12 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by redhat (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by redhatCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.