basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Linux / CVE-2019-13272
CVE-2019-13272 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Linux Kernel vulnerability

A privilege management flaw in Linux kernel ptrace.c allows local users to escalate privileges to root access.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Local privilege escalation vulnerability in ptrace subsystem. Improper privilege handling enables unprivileged users to gain root-level access. Active exploitation observed in the wild.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-12-103EPSS 0.52199 (verify live)4Exploit Public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Public proof-of-concept exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
7 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-12-10).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.52199 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Linux, Kernel. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management — weakness family: Authorization / access control.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-269 · Improper Privilege ManagementAuthorization / access control
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I execute code as an unprivileged local user on a vulnerable Linux system.
Business
System compromise risk increases as any local user becomes a potential entry point for full system takeover.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the ptrace privilege management flaw to bypass access controls and escalate my privileges.
Business
Administrative controls and user isolation mechanisms are rendered ineffective, eliminating a critical security boundary.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I obtain root-level access and execute arbitrary commands with full system privileges.
Business
Complete system compromise occurs, enabling data theft, malware installation, lateral movement, and persistent backdoor establishment.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Public PoC available (VulnCheck)
  • 7 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.