basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / SonicWall / CVE-2019-7483
CVE-2019-7483 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

SonicWall SMA100 vulnerability

SonicWall SMA100 contains an unauthenticated directory traversal vulnerability in the handleWAFRedirect CGI that allows attackers to test for file presence on the server.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit path traversal in SMA100's handleWAFRedirect CGI to enumerate files and directories on the affected system without authentication, potentially revealing sensitive configuration or system information.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-03-283EPSS 0.03977 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
2 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-03-28).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.03977 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: SonicWall, SMA100. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-22 Path Traversal — weakness family: Path traversal / file.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-22 · Path TraversalPath traversal / file
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft malicious path traversal sequences in the handleWAFRedirect parameter to probe for the existence of sensitive files on the target server.
Business
Attackers gain reconnaissance capability to map the server's filesystem structure and identify sensitive files before launching further attacks.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I use file presence detection to locate configuration files, credentials, or system paths that may be exploitable in subsequent attack stages.
Business
Information disclosure enables attackers to refine targeted attacks and increases the surface area for privilege escalation or data theft.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 2 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by sonicwall (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by sonicwallCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.