basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Synacor / CVE-2019-9621
CVE-2019-9621 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS) vulnerability

Synacor Zimbra Collaboration Suite contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in ProxyServlet, allowing attackers to make unauthorized requests from the affected server.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An SSRF flaw in ZCS ProxyServlet enables attackers to forge requests originating from the server, potentially accessing internal resources, bypassing network controls, or pivoting to backend systems. Active exploitation observed.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-07-073EPSS 0.80906 (verify live)4Exploit Weaponized · public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
4 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-07-07).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.80906 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Synacor, Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS). Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), CWE-807 CWE-807.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious request to ProxyServlet that causes the server to make an internal request on my behalf.
Business
Internal network resources become accessible to external attackers without authentication.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I use the server's trusted network position to access backend services, databases, or metadata endpoints that reject external connections.
Business
Sensitive internal data and system configurations are exposed to compromise.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I enumerate and attack internal services by leveraging the compromised server as a proxy for reconnaissance and exploitation.
Business
Infrastructure security perimeter is effectively bypassed, enabling lateral movement and further system compromise.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Weaponized exploit available (VulnCheck)
  • 4 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.