basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / NETGEAR / CVE-2020-26919
CVE-2020-26919 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

NETGEAR JGS516PE Devices vulnerability

NETGEAR JGS516PE devices lack proper function-level access controls, allowing unauthorized access to administrative functions.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Missing access control on the JGS516PE enables unauthenticated or low-privileged attackers to invoke protected administrative operations, potentially leading to device compromise, configuration tampering, or network disruption.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.57195 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
5 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.57195 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: NETGEAR, JGS516PE Devices. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I identify the JGS516PE device on the network and probe for unprotected administrative endpoints.
Business
Network infrastructure becomes discoverable to threat actors conducting reconnaissance.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I invoke administrative functions without proper authentication or with insufficient privilege checks.
Business
Unauthorized modifications to device configuration expose the network to further compromise.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I alter device settings, disable security features, or redirect traffic through the compromised switch.
Business
Network availability and data integrity are compromised; lateral movement into protected segments becomes possible.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 5 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.