basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Cisco / CVE-2020-3118
CVE-2020-3118 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Cisco IOS XR vulnerability

Cisco IOS XR improperly validates string input in Cisco Discovery Protocol messages, allowing unauthenticated adjacent attackers to execute administrative code or trigger device reload.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An adjacent attacker without credentials can exploit improper input validation in CDP messages to achieve remote code execution with administrative privileges or cause denial of service through device reload on affected IOS XR systems.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.11806 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
4 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.11806 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Cisco, IOS XR. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-134 Format String.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious Cisco Discovery Protocol message with improperly validated string input and send it to an adjacent network segment.
Business
Network infrastructure loses availability or is compromised with administrative access, disrupting operations and enabling lateral movement.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the format string vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the routing device.
Business
Attackers gain control of critical network infrastructure, potentially exfiltrating data or redirecting traffic.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I trigger a device reload through the same vulnerability to cause immediate service disruption.
Business
Network outage impacts business continuity and customer-facing services dependent on that infrastructure.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 4 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by cisco (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ciscoCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.