basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Roundcube / CVE-2020-35730
CVE-2020-35730 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Roundcube Webmail vulnerability

Roundcube Webmail contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in linkref_addinindex that allows attackers to inject JavaScript through plain text email messages with malicious link references.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An attacker can craft a plain text email with JavaScript embedded in a link reference element. When processed by the vulnerable linkref_addinindex function in rcube_string_replacer.php, the script executes in the victim's browser, enabling session hijacking, credential theft, or malware distribution

CISA KEV Yes · 2023-06-223EPSS 0.32365 (verify live)4Exploit Public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Public proof-of-concept exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
16 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-06-22).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.32365 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Roundcube, Roundcube Webmail. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-79 Cross-site Scripting (XSS) — weakness family: Web / client.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a plain text email containing JavaScript code within a link reference element.
Business
The organization's email infrastructure becomes a vector for client-side attacks against all users who open the message.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I send the malicious email to target users of Roundcube Webmail.
Business
User sessions and credentials are exposed to compromise when the email is rendered in the vulnerable application.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser context within the Roundcube application.
Business
Attackers gain unauthorized access to user accounts, email data, and can pivot to internal systems or launch further attacks.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Public PoC available (VulnCheck)
  • 16 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.