basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Google / CVE-2021-21148
CVE-2021-21148 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Google Chromium V8 vulnerability

Heap buffer overflow in Chromium V8 engine allows remote code execution through crafted HTML pages, affecting Chrome, Edge, and other Chromium-based browsers.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Remote attacker can trigger heap corruption via malicious web content, potentially achieving code execution in the context of the affected browser process.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.19815 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
2 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.19815 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Google, Chromium V8. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-122 Heap-based Buffer Overflow — weakness family: Memory safety.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious HTML page that triggers a heap buffer overflow in the V8 JavaScript engine.
Business
User visits attacker-controlled or compromised website and browser process is compromised.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the heap corruption to achieve arbitrary code execution within the browser sandbox.
Business
Attacker gains ability to execute code with browser process privileges, potentially accessing user data.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I use the code execution to steal credentials, session tokens, or sensitive information from the compromised browser.
Business
User accounts, financial data, or personal information may be compromised across multiple services.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 2 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by Chrome (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ChromeCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.