basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Micro Focus / CVE-2021-22502
CVE-2021-22502 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Micro Focus Operation Bridge Reporter (OBR) vulnerability

Micro Focus Operation Bridge Reporter (OBR) contains an input validation and command injection vulnerability enabling remote code execution. The flaw is actively exploited in the wild.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An unauthenticated or low-privileged attacker can inject malicious commands through unvalidated input to OBR, achieving arbitrary code execution on the affected system. Active exploitation indicates immediate risk to deployed instances.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.9674 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
679 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.9674 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Micro Focus, Operation Bridge Reporter (OBR). Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation, CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I identify an input vector in OBR that lacks proper validation or sanitization.
Business
Operational visibility into infrastructure is compromised; monitoring systems become attack staging points.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a payload that breaks out of intended command context and executes arbitrary system commands.
Business
Attacker gains code execution privileges equivalent to the OBR service account, potentially system-level access.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I establish persistence, exfiltrate data, or pivot to connected infrastructure and applications.
Business
Enterprise monitoring infrastructure is fully compromised; data confidentiality, integrity, and availability are at risk across monitored systems.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 679 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by microfocus (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microfocusCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.