basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Linux / CVE-2021-22555
CVE-2021-22555 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Linux Kernel vulnerability

Linux Kernel heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in user namespace handling allows privilege escalation or denial of service through heap memory corruption.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A heap buffer overflow in the Linux Kernel's user namespace implementation enables local attackers to corrupt memory, escalate privileges to root, or crash the system. Active exploitation in the wild increases risk.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-10-063EPSS 0.78684 (verify live)4Exploit Public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Public proof-of-concept exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
6 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-06).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.78684 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Linux, Kernel. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write — weakness family: Memory safety.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteMemory safety
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious user namespace configuration to trigger an out-of-bounds write in kernel heap memory.
Business
An unprivileged local user gains root-level code execution on affected systems.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the heap corruption to overwrite kernel data structures and bypass security controls.
Business
Compromised systems face complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability; attackers gain persistent control.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I trigger the vulnerability repeatedly to cause kernel panic and system crash.
Business
Critical infrastructure and services experience unplanned downtime and operational disruption.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Public PoC available (VulnCheck)
  • 6 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by Google (CNA)
  • Named finder/reporter credit (CVE.org)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by GoogleCNA
    Credited with finding itAndy Nguyenunspecified