basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / McAfee / CVE-2021-23874
CVE-2021-23874 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

McAfee Total Protection (MTP) vulnerability

McAfee Total Protection contains an improper privilege management vulnerability allowing local users to gain elevated privileges and execute arbitrary code while bypassing self-defense mechanisms.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A local privilege escalation vulnerability in McAfee Total Protection enables authenticated users to bypass security controls and achieve code execution with elevated system privileges, undermining endpoint protection integrity.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033EPSS 0.01026 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
1 independent public report of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
cisa.gov ↗Confirmed
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.01026 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: McAfee, McAfee Total Protection (MTP). Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-284 Improper Access Control — weakness family: Authorization / access control.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-284 · Improper Access ControlAuthorization / access control
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I establish local system access through standard user credentials or physical device access.
Business
Endpoint protection assumes user-level processes cannot compromise core security functions.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit the privilege management flaw to escalate my process permissions beyond intended restrictions.
Business
Security software self-defense mechanisms fail to prevent unauthorized privilege elevation.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges while MTP self-defense remains inactive or bypassed.
Business
Malware or attacker code runs with system-level access, defeating endpoint detection and response capabilities.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 1 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by trellix (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by trellixCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.