basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Accellion / CVE-2021-27102
CVE-2021-27102 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Accellion FTA vulnerability

Accellion FTA contains an OS command injection vulnerability in a local web service that has been exploited in the wild and leveraged in ransomware campaigns.

Verdict

Today item, not a backlog item.

A local web service in Accellion FTA accepts unsanitized input that can be exploited to execute arbitrary OS commands. Active exploitation and ransomware deployment have been documented, indicating significant real-world risk.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033Ransomware use Flagged3EPSS 0.03654 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
22 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), flagged for known ransomware use.
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.03654 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Accellion, FTA. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation, CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious request to the local web service with embedded OS commands.
Business
Unauthorized command execution on the FTA server enables full system compromise.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I escalate privileges and establish persistence on the compromised host.
Business
Attackers gain sustained access to sensitive file transfer infrastructure and stored data.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I exfiltrate confidential files and deploy ransomware across the environment.
Business
Data breach and operational shutdown result in financial loss, regulatory exposure, and reputational damage.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • Ransomware-use flag (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 22 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.