basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Accellion / CVE-2021-27104
CVE-2021-27104 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Accellion FTA vulnerability

Accellion FTA contains an OS command injection vulnerability in admin endpoints exploitable via crafted POST requests. The flaw has been actively exploited in ransomware campaigns.

Verdict

Today item, not a backlog item.

An unauthenticated or low-privileged attacker can inject arbitrary OS commands through malformed requests to administrative interfaces, achieving remote code execution and enabling data exfiltration or system compromise as a precursor to ransomware deployment.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-11-033Ransomware use Flagged3EPSS 0.56686 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
22 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-11-03), flagged for known ransomware use.
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.56686 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Accellion, FTA. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation, CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a POST request with embedded shell metacharacters targeting an admin endpoint to bypass input validation.
Business
Attackers gain unauthenticated code execution on the file transfer appliance, establishing initial compromise.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I execute system commands with the privileges of the FTA process to enumerate the environment and exfiltrate sensitive files.
Business
Customer data stored in the appliance is accessed and staged for theft or encryption.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I deploy ransomware payloads or lateral movement tools to extend control across the victim's network.
Business
Operations are disrupted; ransom demands follow; regulatory and reputational damage compounds data loss.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • Ransomware-use flag (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 22 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.