basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Cisco / CVE-2022-20775
CVE-2022-20775 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Cisco SD-WAN vulnerability

Cisco SD-WAN CLI contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing authenticated local attackers to bypass access controls and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An authenticated local attacker can exploit improper access controls in SD-WAN CLI commands to traverse the filesystem and execute arbitrary code with elevated privileges, potentially compromising system integrity and confidentiality.

CISA KEV Yes · 2026-02-253EPSS 0.12475 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
8 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-02-25).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.12475 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Cisco, SD-WAN. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-25 CWE-25, CWE-282 CWE-282 — weakness family: Path traversal / file.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-25 · CWE-25CWE-282 · CWE-282Path traversal / file
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I authenticate to the SD-WAN CLI as a standard user with limited privileges.
Business
Legitimate user accounts are provisioned for operational access to network appliances.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a path traversal payload in a CLI command to bypass directory restrictions.
Business
Access control enforcement on CLI commands fails to validate or sanitize user input.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute the malicious command and gain root-level code execution on the device.
Business
The SD-WAN appliance is fully compromised, allowing the attacker to modify configurations, exfiltrate data, or pivot to connected networks.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 8 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by cisco (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ciscoCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.