basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2022-41125
CVE-2022-41125 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Microsoft Windows vulnerability

Microsoft Windows CNG Key Isolation Service vulnerability allows attackers to escalate privileges to SYSTEM level through an unspecified flaw in cryptographic key handling.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows CNG Key Isolation Service enables local attackers to gain SYSTEM-level access. Active exploitation in the wild indicates immediate risk to Windows systems requiring prompt patching.

CISA KEV Yes · 2022-11-083EPSS 0.03021 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
4 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2022-11-08).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.03021 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Microsoft, Windows. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write — weakness family: Memory safety.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-787 · Out-of-bounds WriteMemory safety
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I exploit a flaw in the CNG Key Isolation Service to escalate my local user privileges to SYSTEM level.
Business
Attackers gain unrestricted control over Windows systems, enabling installation of malware, data theft, and lateral movement across enterprise networks.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I leverage SYSTEM access to disable security controls and persistence mechanisms on the compromised host.
Business
Security tools become ineffective, allowing attackers to maintain long-term presence and evade detection across the infrastructure.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 4 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by microsoft (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microsoftCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.