basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / SugarCRM / CVE-2023-22952
CVE-2023-22952 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

SugarCRM Multiple Products vulnerability

SugarCRM multiple products contain a remote code execution vulnerability in EmailTemplates allowing custom PHP code injection via specially crafted requests.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An unauthenticated or low-privileged attacker can inject arbitrary PHP code through EmailTemplates functionality, achieving remote code execution on affected SugarCRM instances. Active exploitation in the wild with high EPSS score indicates immediate risk.

CISA KEV Yes · 2023-02-023EPSS 0.80274 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
28 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2023-02-02).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.80274 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: SugarCRM, Multiple Products. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-20 Improper Input Validation.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious request targeting the EmailTemplates endpoint with embedded PHP code.
Business
The organization's SugarCRM instance becomes a beachhead for unauthorized system access and data exfiltration.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I execute arbitrary PHP commands on the server to establish persistence and lateral movement.
Business
Attackers gain sustained control over customer relationship data, email communications, and integrated business systems.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I escalate privileges and pivot to connected infrastructure or databases.
Business
Breach scope expands beyond CRM to enterprise networks, increasing incident response costs and regulatory exposure.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 28 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.