Threats / GeoVision / CVE-2024-11120
CVE-2024-11120
· EUVD no mirror located
· GCVE no mirror located
Verified 2026-06-22
GeoVision Multiple Devices vulnerability
Multiple GeoVision devices are vulnerable to OS command injection, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. Affected products may be end-of-life or end-of-service.
Verdict
Today item — known-exploited.
Remote unauthenticated OS command injection in GeoVision devices enables direct system compromise. Active exploitation observed in the wild. Discontinuation of affected products is strongly recommended due to lack of vendor support.
01
Is it exploitable?
— the evidence, ranked above the scoreReported exploitation
55 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-05-07).
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.28554 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: GeoVision, Multiple Devices. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
02
Who’s exploiting it?
— attribution turns risk into urgencyAttribution not established
No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.
03
Why it matters
— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board1
Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1
Attacker
I identify a GeoVision device exposed on the network without authentication requirements.
Business
Perimeter security fails to prevent access to legacy surveillance infrastructure.
2
Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2
Attacker
I craft a malicious request containing shell metacharacters to inject OS commands into the vulnerable input handler.
Business
Application input validation is absent, allowing command injection payloads to reach the system shell.
3
Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3
Attacker
I execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the device process, gaining full system control.
Business
The compromised device becomes a foothold for lateral movement, data exfiltration, or network reconnaissance.
04
What to do
— defensible action- Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05