basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Mitel / CVE-2024-55550
CVE-2024-55550 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Mitel MiCollab vulnerability

Mitel MiCollab contains a path traversal vulnerability (CWE-22) allowing authenticated administrators to read local files through insufficient input sanitization. When chained with CVE-2024-41713, unauthenticated attackers can read arbitrar

Verdict

Today item, not a backlog item.

This path traversal vulnerability enables file disclosure on MiCollab systems. Exploitation in the wild and association with ransomware campaigns indicates active adversary interest. Chaining with unauthenticated access vectors significantly increases risk.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-01-073Ransomware use Flagged3EPSS 0.375 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
7 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-01-07), flagged for known ransomware use.
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.375 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Mitel, MiCollab. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-22 Path Traversal — weakness family: Path traversal / file.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-22 · Path TraversalPath traversal / file
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I exploit CVE-2024-41713 to gain unauthenticated remote access and read files from the MiCollab server.
Business
Attackers obtain initial reconnaissance data and sensitive configuration files without credentials.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I extract administrative credentials or session tokens from disclosed files to escalate privileges.
Business
Attackers pivot from file read access to authenticated administrative control of the collaboration platform.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I use the path traversal vulnerability with administrative access to read sensitive application and system files.
Business
Attackers gather intelligence on internal systems, user data, and encryption keys to support ransomware deployment.
4

Data at risk — exfiltration narrative 4

Attacker
I exfiltrate confidential communications, contact lists, and business data from MiCollab storage.
Business
Attackers obtain leverage for extortion and establish persistence for ransomware encryption campaigns.
5

Lights out — disruption & extortion narrative 5

Attacker
I deploy ransomware across the organization using administrative access and system knowledge gained from file disclosure.
Business
Operations halt, data is encrypted, and the organization faces extortion demands and potential data breach liability.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • Ransomware-use flag (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 7 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.