basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Kentico / CVE-2025-2747
CVE-2025-2747 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Kentico Xperience CMS vulnerability

Kentico Xperience CMS contains an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing attackers to control administrative objects through an alternate path or channel.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An unauthenticated or low-privileged attacker can bypass authentication mechanisms in Kentico Xperience CMS to gain administrative control. This vulnerability is actively exploited in the wild and carries high exploitation probability.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-10-203EPSS 0.91284 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
3 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-20).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.91284 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Kentico, Xperience CMS. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-288 Auth Bypass via Alternate Path — weakness family: Authentication.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I discover an alternate authentication path that does not enforce proper credential validation.
Business
Administrative access is compromised without legitimate credentials, enabling unauthorized system control.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I leverage the bypass to access administrative functions and modify critical CMS objects and configurations.
Business
Content integrity is lost; attackers can inject malicious content, modify user accounts, or alter system settings.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I establish persistence by creating new administrative accounts or modifying existing ones.
Business
Long-term unauthorized access is maintained, complicating incident response and recovery efforts.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 3 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by VulnCheck (CNA)
  • Named finder/reporter credit (CVE.org)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by VulnCheckCNA
    Credited with finding itPiotr Bazydlo (watchTowr)finder