basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / D-Link / CVE-2025-29635
CVE-2025-29635 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

D-Link DIR-823X vulnerability

D-Link DIR-823X contains a command injection vulnerability in the /goform/set_prohibiting endpoint that allows authorized attackers to execute arbitrary commands on affected devices.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An authenticated attacker can inject and execute arbitrary system commands on vulnerable DIR-823X routers through a POST request, potentially compromising device integrity and network security. The product is reportedly end-of-life or end-of-service.

CISA KEV Yes · 2026-04-243EPSS 0.3515 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
6 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-04-24).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.3515 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: D-Link, DIR-823X. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-77 Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious POST request to /goform/set_prohibiting with injected shell commands embedded in the request parameters.
Business
An insider or compromised account holder gains unauthorized command execution capability on network infrastructure.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the web service process to modify device configuration, install backdoors, or pivot to other network segments.
Business
Device compromise enables lateral movement, data exfiltration, or persistent unauthorized access to the network.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I maintain persistence by modifying startup scripts or installing rootkits that survive device reboots.
Business
Long-term compromise of network perimeter security increases exposure to advanced threats and regulatory violations.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 6 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.