basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Smartbedded / CVE-2025-4008
CVE-2025-4008 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Smartbedded Meteobridge vulnerability

Smartbedded Meteobridge contains an unauthenticated command injection vulnerability allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on affected devices.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

A remote unauthenticated command injection flaw in Meteobridge enables attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated system privileges. Active exploitation in the wild increases operational risk for deployed instances.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-10-023EPSS 0.93864 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
23 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-02).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.93864 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Smartbedded, Meteobridge. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-306 Missing Authentication, CWE-77 Command Injection — weakness family: Authentication, Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious input that bypasses input validation to inject shell commands into a vulnerable parameter.
Business
Attackers gain initial network access to weather station infrastructure without authentication barriers.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I execute arbitrary commands with root-level privileges on the target Meteobridge device.
Business
Complete system compromise occurs, enabling data theft, device manipulation, or lateral movement into connected networks.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I establish persistent access or deploy malware to maintain control of the compromised device.
Business
Long-term operational disruption and potential use of weather infrastructure in broader attack campaigns.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 23 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by ONEKEY (CNA)
  • Named finder/reporter credit (CVE.org)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by ONEKEYCNA
    Credited with finding itONEKEY Research Labsfinder