basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Prettier / CVE-2025-54313
CVE-2025-54313 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Prettier eslint-config-prettier vulnerability

eslint-config-prettier contains malicious code that executes during package installation, deploying node-gyp.dll malware on Windows systems.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Supply chain compromise in a widely-used npm package. Installation triggers execution of embedded malware, affecting developers and CI/CD pipelines. CWE-506 indicates intentional malicious code obfuscation.

CISA KEV Yes · 2026-01-223EPSS 0.04146 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
6 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-01-22).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.04146 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Prettier, eslint-config-prettier. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-506 CWE-506.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
Compromise the eslint-config-prettier package repository to inject malicious install.js script.
Business
Development teams unknowingly install compromised dependency, introducing malware into build environments.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
Execute node-gyp.dll malware during npm install on Windows developer machines and CI/CD runners.
Business
Malware gains execution context within development infrastructure with potential access to source code and credentials.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
Establish persistence and exfiltrate sensitive data or inject backdoors into built artifacts.
Business
Compromised software builds propagate malware to end users; intellectual property and customer data at risk.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 6 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.