basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Dassault Systèmes / CVE-2025-6205
CVE-2025-6205 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso vulnerability

Dassault Systèmes DELMIA Apriso contains a missing authorization vulnerability (CWE-862) allowing attackers to gain privileged access without proper permission checks.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An unauthenticated or low-privileged attacker can bypass authorization controls in DELMIA Apriso to escalate privileges and access restricted functionality. Active exploitation in the wild with high exploitability (EPSS 0.83) poses immediate risk to manufacturing operations.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-10-283EPSS 0.69174 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
117 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-10-28).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.69174 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Dassault Systèmes, DELMIA Apriso. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-862 Missing Authorization — weakness family: Authorization / access control.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
WeaknessCWE-862 · Missing AuthorizationAuthorization / access control
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I identify that the application fails to enforce authorization checks on sensitive operations.
Business
Unauthorized access to manufacturing execution systems disrupts production scheduling and quality control.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I escalate my privileges by directly accessing administrative functions without proper permission validation.
Business
Attackers gain control over critical process parameters, inventory management, and compliance records.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I modify production workflows, alter audit logs, or extract sensitive operational data.
Business
Loss of data integrity, regulatory non-compliance, and inability to verify production authenticity damage customer trust and create legal liability.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 117 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by 3DS (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by 3DSCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.