basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Sangoma / CVE-2025-64328
CVE-2025-64328 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Sangoma FreePBX vulnerability

Sangoma FreePBX Endpoint Manager contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the testconnection function that allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands as the asterisk system user.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

An authenticated attacker can inject OS commands through the check_ssh_connect() function to gain remote code execution on the FreePBX system. This post-authentication vulnerability enables lateral movement and system compromise with asterisk-level privileges.

CISA KEV Yes · 2026-02-033EPSS 0.84052 (verify live)4
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Reported exploitation
5 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-02-03).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.84052 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Sangoma, FreePBX . Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I authenticate to FreePBX with valid credentials and access the Endpoint Manager interface.
Business
Internal user accounts or compromised credentials provide initial access to the administrative interface.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a malicious input in the testconnection function that injects shell metacharacters into the check_ssh_connect() call.
Business
Input validation failures allow attackers to break out of intended command boundaries.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I execute arbitrary OS commands with asterisk user privileges to establish persistence or pivot within the network.
Business
Remote code execution compromises system integrity and enables data exfiltration or further lateral movement.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • 5 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Catalogued by GitHub_M (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by GitHub_MCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.