basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Pi-hole / CVE-2020-8816
CVE-2020-8816 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Pi-hole AdminLTE vulnerability

Pi-hole AdminLTE v4.3.2 allows remote code execution through crafted DHCP static lease configuration by authenticated dashboard users, exploiting OS command injection.

Verdict

Today item — known-exploited.

Authenticated attackers with dashboard access can execute arbitrary system commands via malicious DHCP lease parameters, achieving full system compromise on Pi-hole installations.

CISA KEV Yes · 2021-12-103EPSS 0.77847 (verify live)4Exploit Public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Public proof-of-concept exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
2 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2021-12-10).
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.77847 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Pi-hole, AdminLTE. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-78 OS Command Injection — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I authenticate to the Pi-hole dashboard using valid credentials.
Business
Insider threat or credential compromise creates initial access vector to administrative interface.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I craft a DHCP static lease entry containing shell metacharacters or command injection payloads.
Business
Lack of input sanitization in lease configuration processing enables code injection.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I submit the malicious lease configuration, triggering unsanitized command execution on the host system.
Business
Arbitrary code runs with Pi-hole service privileges, compromising DNS infrastructure and potentially the entire network.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Public PoC available (VulnCheck)
  • 2 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by mitre (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by mitreCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.