basicsecurity.net
Proof, not just disclosure.
Threats / Microsoft / CVE-2025-53770
CVE-2025-53770 · EUVD no mirror located · GCVE no mirror located Verified 2026-06-22

Microsoft SharePoint vulnerability

Microsoft SharePoint Server on-premises contains a deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502) allowing remote code execution. This is a patch bypass for CVE-2025-49704 and is actively exploited in ransomware campaigns.

Verdict

Today item, not a backlog item.

Critical remote code execution vulnerability in SharePoint on-premises via unsafe deserialization. High exploitation activity and ransomware deployment observed. Patch bypass status indicates previous mitigations were insufficient.

CISA KEV Yes · 2025-07-203Ransomware use Flagged3EPSS 0.99982 (verify live)4Exploit Weaponized · public PoC5
01

Is it exploitable?

— the evidence, ranked above the score
Exploit available
Fully weaponized — public exploit code is cataloged for this vulnerability.We link the existence of the exploit; we do not host or redistribute payloads.
Reported exploitation
199 independent public reports of in-the-wild exploitation are cataloged.Distinct reporting sources (vendor, incident response, government); open them for the underlying claims.
Exploited in the wild
Listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2025-07-20), flagged for known ransomware use.
CISA KEV ↗Confirmed
Probability (EPSS)
EPSS 0.99982 — modeled likelihood of exploitation activity.EPSS is a daily-changing model output — open the source for today's value.
Severity / affected
Affected: Microsoft, SharePoint. Confirm exact fixed builds in the vendor advisory.
NVD ↗Reported
Weakness (CWE)
Mapped to CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data — weakness family: Injection.CWE assignment from the public NVD record; the weakness class drives how the flaw is exploited.
NVD ↗Reported
02

Who’s exploiting it?

— attribution turns risk into urgency
Attribution not established

No confirmed (advisory-backed) threat-actor attribution is established for this record. Absence of a named actor is not absence of compromise — see Coverage & confidence.

03

Why it matters

— the attack path, told twice: adversary, then board
1

Front door — unauthenticated access narrative 1

Attacker
I craft a malicious serialized object and send it to an unauthenticated SharePoint endpoint.
Business
Attacker gains initial network access to a core collaboration platform without authentication.
2

Keys to the kingdom — privilege/identity takeover narrative 2

Attacker
I exploit unsafe deserialization to execute arbitrary code with SharePoint service privileges.
Business
Attacker achieves code execution within the trusted security context of the SharePoint application.
3

Lateral reach — past segmentation narrative 3

Attacker
I establish persistence and lateral movement across the on-premises infrastructure.
Business
Attacker pivots to sensitive data repositories and domain resources accessible from SharePoint.
4

Data at risk — exfiltration narrative 4

Attacker
I deploy ransomware payloads across connected systems and encrypt business-critical data.
Business
Operations halt; data becomes inaccessible; ransom demands issued; recovery costs and downtime escalate.
04

What to do

— defensible action
  • Remediate per the vendor advisory — confirm the fixed build for your version and verify exposure.1
Say it to the boardA vulnerability with this evidence profile is a defensible budget line, not a backlog ticket — fund the change against the proof above.
05

Coverage & confidence

— what we know, and what we don’t

Established (cited)

  • KEV listing (CISA)
  • Ransomware-use flag (CISA)
  • EPSS probability (FIRST)
  • Weaponized exploit available (VulnCheck)
  • 199 reported-exploitation source(s)
  • CWE weakness mapping (NVD)
  • Public exploit availability
  • Catalogued by microsoft (CNA)
  • Coverage gaps — stated, not hidden

  • No EUVD / GCVE mirror in feed — single-authority dependency for the identifier.
  • EPSS & exposure are time-varying; verify live at the source.
  • Threat-actor attribution not established from feed data — absence of a name is not absence of compromise.
  • No finder/reporter credit recorded in the public CVE entry — the work behind this find is unattributed.
  • Disclosure & credit2
    Catalogued by microsoftCNA
    Credited with finding itNo finder named in the public CVE record — the work behind this find is unattributed.